Battlefield 3 Server settings (Here we go again !!)
- FcUK_A
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Founder [Administrator]
13 years 3 weeks ago #34336
by FcUK_A
Replied by FcUK_A on topic Battlefield 3 Server settings (Here we go again !!)
Can't please everyone can we. Luckily it hasn’t cost you anything. If we have a server which clan members are paying for then I would like to think 90% of the time they will play on that, as for modes maps settings etc they can change whenever!
But again absolutely pointless paying £60 PM for a 64 man server then drop it to 32 or 24 ! I played 3 hours this morning and can honestly say most of the maps are sweet with 64 players.
Your views my views !
A
But again absolutely pointless paying £60 PM for a 64 man server then drop it to 32 or 24 ! I played 3 hours this morning and can honestly say most of the maps are sweet with 64 players.
Your views my views !
A
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- FcUK_A
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Founder [Administrator]
13 years 3 weeks ago #34361
by FcUK_A
Replied by FcUK_A on topic Battlefield 3 Server settings (Here we go again !!)
People like playing on smaller servers because they can rank up quicker !
Well thats my view !
A
Well thats my view !
A
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- FcUK_Q
- Offline
- FcUK NCO
Less
More
- Posts: 816
- Thank you received: 0
13 years 3 weeks ago #34369
by FcUK_Q
Replied by FcUK_Q on topic Battlefield 3 Server settings (Here we go again !!)
I like our server and enjoy playing on it (just because I'm swearing at the twat that killed me doesn't mean I hate the game ) and I'll continue to pay for it because of that!
As I see if everyone has there own pref, and we need to respect that, perhaps we could open up the 24/18 man match server to public or will that break the law
Once the hype dies down it may be worth looking at cheaper alternatives 32 or less player servers.
As for our current server:
Think Tehran Highway is the only one that lags, but from what I have heard its same on all servers..
(might be worth removing from loop until its fixed)
Peace OUT
Q
As I see if everyone has there own pref, and we need to respect that, perhaps we could open up the 24/18 man match server to public or will that break the law
Once the hype dies down it may be worth looking at cheaper alternatives 32 or less player servers.
As for our current server:
Think Tehran Highway is the only one that lags, but from what I have heard its same on all servers..
(might be worth removing from loop until its fixed)
Peace OUT
Q
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- FcUK_A
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Founder [Administrator]
13 years 3 weeks ago #34375
by FcUK_A
Replied by FcUK_A on topic Battlefield 3 Server settings (Here we go again !!)
They'll sort out the 16 Man server soon for us.
A
A
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- FcUK_D
- Offline
- FcUK CO
Less
More
- Posts: 1870
- Karma: 1
- Thank you received: 0
13 years 2 weeks ago #34441
by FcUK_D
Replied by FcUK_D on topic Battlefield 3 Server settings (Here we go again !!)
so far i personally think 64 man server is too much, too hectic, 16 a side would be plenty.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
- FcUK_A
- Topic Author
- Offline
- Founder [Administrator]
13 years 2 weeks ago #34442
by FcUK_A
Replied by FcUK_A on topic Battlefield 3 Server settings (Here we go again !!)
64 on Metro is mental but 64 on most of the other maps is just fine ! It’s BF not COD.
But that's just my views !
A
But that's just my views !
A
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Time to create page: 0.042 seconds